[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
Subject: |
Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries |
Date: |
28 May 2001 00:27:57 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor) |
On May 27, 2001, Philip Blundell <address@hidden> wrote:
> The easiest way to test for a working ld.so is just to look at the version
> number.
And how do you obtain this version number, particularly in a
cross-compilation environment?
> Anything >= 2.2 will be OK.
Even in the case of non-PIC code being loaded into a shared library?
I seem to recall having heard it was something plain impossible to
fix.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Philip Blundell, 2001/05/27
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/27
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Philip Blundell, 2001/05/27
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries,
Alexandre Oliva <=
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Philip Blundell, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Philip Blundell, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Philip Blundell, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/05/30
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/30