[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
Subject: |
Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries |
Date: |
28 May 2001 18:13:49 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor) |
On May 28, 2001, Philip Blundell <address@hidden> wrote:
>> And how do you obtain this version number, particularly in a
>> cross-compilation environment?
> In a cross-compilation environment there is nothing you can do. People will
> just have to upgrade their C library if they have problems.
>>> Anything >= 2.2 will be OK.
>>
>> Even in the case of non-PIC code being loaded into a shared library?
> Yes.
Great. Will you please post a patch to address@hidden that
tests the glibc version in the native arm case, and assumes it's new
enough in the cross-build case?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Philip Blundell, 2001/05/27
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/27
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Philip Blundell, 2001/05/27
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/27
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Philip Blundell, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries,
Alexandre Oliva <=
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Philip Blundell, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Philip Blundell, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/05/30
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/30