[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries
From: |
Philip Blundell |
Subject: |
Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries |
Date: |
Sun, 27 May 2001 22:59:43 +0100 |
>The reason is precisely that some old ARM dynamic loaders failed to
>adjust certain dynamic relocations, and the way non-PIC code is
>generated for the ARM prevents it from being properly introduced in
>shared libraries. I know the first problem has already been fixed in
>recent versions of glibc, but I don't know about the latter. If you
>know for sure it has, and can come up with a test we can use to make
>sure we've got a fixed version, I'd be happy to use it on
>GNU/Linux/ARM.
The easiest way to test for a working ld.so is just to look at the version
number. Anything >= 2.2 will be OK.
p.
pgpXIjGQ4jrXE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Philip Blundell, 2001/05/27
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/27
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries,
Philip Blundell <=
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/27
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Philip Blundell, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Philip Blundell, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Philip Blundell, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/28
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/05/30
- Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/30