Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries

[Gary V . Vaughan]

On Tuesday 29 May 2001  3:23 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 28, 2001, Philip Blundell <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Strange, I'm looking at what I thought was the latest in CVS.
>
> Hmm...  Indeed.  Sorry about the confusion.  It seems that Gary missed
> some of the latest patches in his merge from the multi-language
> branch.  This change was checked in in both 1.4 and ML branches on
> 2001-05-16.  Gary?

An oversight on my part.  Sorry.  I haven't been cross referencing the 
ChangeLog as I merge, and where there is a conflict, I'm assuming that HEAD 
is correct.  I'm not sure how we can tacklie this sort of problem... I 
suppose that for a commit to stick between the start of the merge 
(2001-05-26) and when we finally kill off MLB in favour of the merged HEAD, 
the patch needs to go into HEAD.

This confusion is probably due to our crossed wire over which branch the 
merge should happen in.  My bad.  I'll go back over recent MLB patches after 
the merge is complete (unless you want to port them into HEAD n the 
meanwhile), which should catch any odd ones like this.

Cheers,
        Gary.
-- 
  ())_.  Gary V. Vaughan     gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
  ( '/   Research Scientist  http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk        ,_())____
  / )=   GNU Hacker          http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool   \'      `&
`(_~)_   Tech' Author        http://sources.redhat.com/autobook    =`---d__/