[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17
From: |
Michael Albinus |
Subject: |
Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17 |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 20:39:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Daniel O'Connor" <address@hidden> writes:
Hi Daniel,
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 05:43, Michael Albinus wrote:
>> > (or (>= emacs-major-version 20)
>> > (load "cl-seq")))
>>
>> But tramp.el has the same code inside. Did it compile without pain?
>
> Yeah I know.. It DID compile OK.. It is very strange :(
>
>> Best regards, Michael.
>>
>> PS: which Tramp version do you use? 2.0.45?
>
> I use .44 as that is the latest I can see.
I am lost. I have no idea how to debug this issue, and I cannot
reproduce it locally. Have you tried Tramp 2.1? It doesn't include
that statement ...
Best regards, Michael.
- TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/11
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/11
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Michael Albinus, 2004/10/12
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/12
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17,
Michael Albinus <=
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/17
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Michael Albinus, 2004/10/18
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/18
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Michael Albinus, 2004/10/18
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/18