[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17
From: |
Michael Albinus |
Subject: |
Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17 |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:13:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Daniel O'Connor" <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:47, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>> Hi,
>> When I try and build TRAMP with xemacs 21.5.b17 it gets stuck eating CPU &
>> RAM compiling tramp-smb.el :(
>
> Ahh, this appears to be caused by this ->
> ;; Pacify byte-compiler
> (eval-when-compile
> (require 'cl)
> (require 'custom)
> ;; Emacs 19.34 compatibility hack -- is this needed?
> (or (>= emacs-major-version 20)
> (load "cl-seq")))
But tramp.el has the same code inside. Did it compile without pain?
Best regards, Michael.
PS: which Tramp version do you use? 2.0.45?
- TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/11
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/11
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17,
Michael Albinus <=
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/12
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Michael Albinus, 2004/10/17
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/17
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Michael Albinus, 2004/10/18
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/18
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Michael Albinus, 2004/10/18
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/18