[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17
From: |
Daniel O'Connor |
Subject: |
TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17 |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:47:01 +0930 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7 |
Hi,
When I try and build TRAMP with xemacs 21.5.b17 it gets stuck eating CPU & RAM
compiling tramp-smb.el :(
If I remove that I can't seem to get it working :( EFS seems really REALLY
hungry for names :-/
(Also I can't see where the XEmacs alternative filename spec is mentioned in
the manual?!)
If I set tramp-unified-filenames it seems to work OK though (I haven't seen
anything break yet anyway :)
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
-- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
pgpFvMh2Ga8EO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17,
Daniel O'Connor <=
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/11
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Michael Albinus, 2004/10/12
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/12
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Michael Albinus, 2004/10/17
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/17
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Michael Albinus, 2004/10/18
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/18
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Michael Albinus, 2004/10/18
- Re: TRAMP vs xemacs 21.5.b17, Daniel O'Connor, 2004/10/18