[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git]
|
From: |
Martin Langhoff |
|
Subject: |
Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git] |
|
Date: |
Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:05:38 +1200 |
On 9/22/07, Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> wrote:
> The big advantage of git-cvsimport is that it can do incremental imports,
Indeed. And it can take over incrementals on a GIT repo initially
imported by parsecvs or cvs2git. That's the recommended practice for
tracking non-trivial CVS repos -- IOWs "that's what I do" ;-)
cheers,
m
- conversion to git, Eric Blake, 2007/09/19
- cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Eric Blake, 2007/09/20
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Steffen Prohaska, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Linus Torvalds, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Robin Rosenberg, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Johannes Schindelin, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Robin Rosenberg, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Johannes Schindelin, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Robin Rosenberg, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git],
Martin Langhoff <=
Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Eric Blake, 2007/09/21
Re: conversion to git, Eric Blake, 2007/09/24