[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git]
From: |
Robin Rosenberg |
Subject: |
Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git] |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:42:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 |
fredag 21 september 2007 skrev Johannes Schindelin:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Robin Rosenberg wrote:
>
> > fredag 21 september 2007 skrev Linus Torvalds:
> > >
> > > The big advantage of git-cvsimport is that it can do incremental
> > > imports, which I don't think the other methods do. But if there is any
> > > choice at all, and especially if you're not that interested in the
> > > incremental feature (ie you can cut over to git, and perhaps use
> > > git-cvsserver to "supprt" CVS users) the other CVS importers are
> > > likely to be much better.
> >
> > fromcvs does incremental import and it's very fast and uses much less
> > memory than cvsimport. It needs the rcs files however and will not
> > convert non-branch tags.
>
> Plus you have to install Ruby. Just wanted people to know.
You don't like Ruby, do you? It worth it, really.
-- robin
- conversion to git, Eric Blake, 2007/09/19
- cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Eric Blake, 2007/09/20
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Steffen Prohaska, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Linus Torvalds, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Robin Rosenberg, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Johannes Schindelin, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git],
Robin Rosenberg <=
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Johannes Schindelin, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Robin Rosenberg, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Martin Langhoff, 2007/09/21
Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Eric Blake, 2007/09/21
Re: conversion to git, Eric Blake, 2007/09/24