[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git]
From: |
Robin Rosenberg |
Subject: |
Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git] |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:16:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 |
fredag 21 september 2007 skrev Johannes Schindelin:
> No, it's yet another dependency. And the quality of the code still
> depends on the programmer, not the language.
I think I can agree there, on both counts. But, if you want a good incremental
CVS importer and have access to the rcs files, that's the one there is.
git-cvsimport has a dependency on cvsps, which isn't included. You have to
to look it up yourself chooing among a dozen unequally bad versions.
Installing ruby isn't any harder.
The dependency excludes it from being included with Git, but it does not
disqualify it as a tool on it's own.
-- robin
- conversion to git, Eric Blake, 2007/09/19
- cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Eric Blake, 2007/09/20
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Steffen Prohaska, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Linus Torvalds, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Robin Rosenberg, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Johannes Schindelin, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Robin Rosenberg, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Johannes Schindelin, 2007/09/21
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git],
Robin Rosenberg <=
- Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Martin Langhoff, 2007/09/21
Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git], Eric Blake, 2007/09/21
Re: conversion to git, Eric Blake, 2007/09/24