Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?)

m4-patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?)

From:	Paul Eggert
Subject:	Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?)
Date:	Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:32:25 -0700
User-agent:	Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

address@hidden (Eric Blake) writes:

> Bruno, is it okay to apply this?
>
> 2006-06-14  Eric Blake  <address@hidden>
>
>       * ssize_t.m4 (gt_TYPE_SSIZE_T): Work in spite of -Werror.

I'm not Bruno, but yes, please apply that.  Thanks.

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Eric Blake, 2006/06/09
- Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Santiago Vila, 2006/06/13
  - Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Eric Blake, 2006/06/13
    - Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Santiago Vila, 2006/06/14
    - Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Paul Eggert, 2006/06/14
    - Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Santiago Vila, 2006/06/14
- Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Eric Blake, 2006/06/14
  - Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Jim Meyering, 2006/06/15
  - Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Paul Eggert <=
  - Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Santiago Vila, 2006/06/15
    - Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Eric Blake, 2006/06/15
    - stackovf implementation [Was: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?)], Eric Blake, 2006/06/15
    - Re: stackovf implementation [Was: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?)], Eric Blake, 2006/06/20
    - Re: stackovf implementation [Was: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?)], Santiago Vila, 2006/06/21
    - Re: stackovf implementation, Eric Blake, 2006/06/22
  - Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Bruno Haible, 2006/06/21

Prev by Date: Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?)
Next by Date: Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?)
Previous by thread: Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?)
Next by thread: Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread