[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?)
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:03:34 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
Eric Blake asked:
> Bruno, is it okay to apply this?
>
> 2006-06-14 Eric Blake <address@hidden>
>
> * ssize_t.m4 (gt_TYPE_SSIZE_T): Work in spite of -Werror.
The change is OK. I'm copying it to GNU gettext, where the file comes
from. (Although I think that using CPPFLAGS=-Werror is calling for
unnecessary trouble.) Thanks.
Bruno
- Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), (continued)
- Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Eric Blake, 2006/06/14
- Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Jim Meyering, 2006/06/15
- Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Paul Eggert, 2006/06/15
- Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Santiago Vila, 2006/06/15
- Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?), Eric Blake, 2006/06/15
- stackovf implementation [Was: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?)], Eric Blake, 2006/06/15
- Re: stackovf implementation [Was: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?)], Eric Blake, 2006/06/20
- Re: stackovf implementation [Was: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?)], Santiago Vila, 2006/06/21
- Re: stackovf implementation, Eric Blake, 2006/06/22
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: regex.c not 64-bit clean (?),
Bruno Haible <=