[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2003-02-12 / tramp-remote-path vs. LD_LIBRARY_PATH
From: |
Kai Großjohann |
Subject: |
Re: 2003-02-12 / tramp-remote-path vs. LD_LIBRARY_PATH |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:36:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.3.50 |
address@hidden writes:
>>>>>> "KG" == Kai Großjohann <address@hidden> writes:
>
> KG> That's right. You're the first to need it, I think. Do you need it?
>
> Well, not me personally,
Yes, I understood the theoretical problem. (After you mentioned it.
I hadn't thought of that before. Thanks for that hint!) But the
question is, is it also a problem in practice? Are there programs
that people wish to use with Tramp that depend on that part of the
environment?
Now coming to think of it, I think it's not really a problem: people's
shell init files will set up $LD_LIBRARY_PATH appropriately, and Tramp
will just inherit that setting.
So, from the theoretical point of view, there is no problem :-)
But then, in theory there is no difference between theory and
practice...
--
Installation via wizzard (Linux-Magazin, German magazine)