Re: [Protux-devel] Chaning plan

[Luciano Domenico Giordana]

what did you use for memory leak dumping ? Valgrind ?

So, I also plan to improve just a little the bus detecction. Sometimes
it does not detect quit well, yet :-(

Regards



On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:24:14 +0100, Remon Sijrier
<address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> 
> > hehe, we indeed have been facing lots of oposite perspectives Remon..
> > that´s kind of  funny sometimes...
> 
> :-)
> 
> > I decided to do so just to get back coding ASAP. Also, there will a
> > little impact on the "good-mue" in the future, they are completely
> > different concepts and implementations.
> >
> > This is just because in January I will start produce an album and I
> > need to have some undo engine which at least avoid big mistakes. Also,
> > It will good to redocument the code, restudy it and clean new bugs.
> 
> Ah, that explains a lot :-)
> 
> So summarizing, you try to code a simple undo engine before January without
> adding new features, and cleaning existing bugs new documentation?
> 
> He, I guess my recent work will serve you very well (fixing the memory leaks
> though I think most of them are fixed now, need to upload it, probably next
> week. Also the serialization of the peak load/build threads is very usefull)
> 
> Perhaps, we could still follow the original plan somewhat (without MUE) and go
> for an intermediate release, let's say Protux-0.26.0 ?
> Then we have at least a new release, though no real new features except for
> the true context approach thingie ;-)
> Also, a lot of drawing improvements are made allready, add some usability
> improvements upon that and there we have version -.26.0 :-)
> 
> 
> Remon
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:54:50 +0100, Remon Sijrier
> >
> > <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > Hello Luciano,
> > >
> > > > The current plan for protux is to develop MUE as a must for next
> > > > realease. Since this is a very hard work, and I really am out-of-time
> > > > to do so, I am changing the plan so we can put a basic Undo engine ,
> > > > thus a new realease, before end of year.
> > >
> > > Wow, the end of this year is really soon!
> > >
> > > Do you have any plans what to code for this release?
> > >
> > > > The ideia is to implement a a SAW-PLUS-LIKE undo engine (very poor)
> > > > which will offer the basic of undo engine. In a mid-term future, the
> > > > planned MUE will be implemented.
> > > >
> > > > This way, people will not have to wait so much for a new release.
> > >
> > > Well, thats true of course, but unless a whole new bunch of features get
> > > coded the new release doesn't add that much from a users point of view.
> > >
> > > If I may give a suggestion.
> > > I think it's still better to stick to the old plan and code MUE when you
> > > have time again instead of coding new stuff which probably holds back the
> > > MUE development when it starts sometime in the future.
> > > Also, the code base at the moment is in a very good shape for developing
> > > MUE, which may become much less when a simple undo engine gets coded in
> > > :-(
> > >
> > > For my part, I don't need or want a new release at the moment, but I do
> > > like a Protux with a good and clean Undo Engine.
> > > Of course, a lot of refinements can be made all over the program, but
> > > coding a "temporarily undo engine",  I don't like it, sorry :-)
> > >
> > > Please, rethink this situation. Nobody wins when a new version of Protux
> > > is released in a hasty manner with almost no additional
> > > features/improvements made in respect to the previous release.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Remon
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Protux-devel mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/protux-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Protux-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/protux-devel
> 


-- 
Luciano Domenico Giordana
Software Engineer - Goodyear do Brasil - http://www.goodyear.com.br
Project Protux : http://www.nongnu.org/protux