[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: module cleanup [2/n]
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: module cleanup [2/n] |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:06:14 +0100 |
Hi Eric,
Some nits. I'd have reviewed before you committed, except that I've
been
offline for almost a week while I relocate to England.
On Sep 7, 2007, at 9:58 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
2007-09-06 Eric Blake <address@hidden>
Wrap lt_dlhandle in struct m4_module.
Wrapping like this introduces an additional dereference every time a
module
is accessed. For this, and aesthetic reasons, I'd rather see
m4_module as
a simple typedef alias.
(m4_module): New declaration. Simple for now, but intended for
growth.
I would say that you have found a deficiency in the libltdl apis if
you need
to duplicate information that is already tracked by libltdl itself,
or that
you are unable to store with lt_dlcaller_set_data...
(m4_module_makeresident, m4_module_refcount): New functions.
These should be macros (at least with NDEBUG) that defer to the
identical ltdl
calls, to avoid the extra stack frame.
(module_close): Delete, and inline into module_remove.
I rather liked the symmetry before this change :-(
Index: m4/input.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/m4/m4/m4/input.c,v
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -u -p -r1.68 input.c
--- m4/input.c 7 Aug 2007 03:15:26 -0000 1.68
+++ m4/input.c 7 Sep 2007 20:48:06 -0000
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ struct m4_input_block
struct
{
const m4_builtin *builtin; /* pointer to builtin's function. */
- lt_dlhandle handle; /* originating module. */
+ m4_module *handle; /* originating module. */
m4_module *module;
...would make it easier to distinguish between handles (ld_dlhandle)
and modules
(m4_module *) on the boundaries between the ltdl and m4module code.
Cheers,
Gary
--
())_. Email me: address@hidden
( '/ Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net
/ )= ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
`(_~)_ Join my AGLOCO Network: http://www.agloco.com/r/BBBS7912
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: module cleanup [1/n], Gary V. Vaughan, 2007/09/11