Karen Lewellen dixit:
They are referencing a11y...which has an article stating that while many use
tools that can access JavaScript, not everyone does, or can.
Meaning both options should be available.
I fully agree. But from the first rounds of back-and-forth with them, they:
a) do not seem to understand that accessibility is more than screenreaders
b) are not interested in supporting anything with less than 1% users
c) to determine said percentage they use a screenreader user survey
d) say lynx is “not a popular choice” and to use a “modern” browser
e) apparently a thing called browsh exists which… basically wraps Firefox;
its output is very visual, it would probably be confusing on a
Braille line and not work well with the typical 60 columns these have
These ECMAscript apologists are annoying me. Maybe we need more people
running in their doors… (not literally, of course).
bye,
//mirabilos
--
21:12⎜<Vutral> sogar bei opensolaris haben die von der community so
ziemlich jeden mist eingebaut │ man sollte unices nich so machen das
desktopuser zuviel intresse kriegen │ das macht die code base kaputt
21:13⎜<Vutral:#MirBSD> linux war früher auch mal besser :D