Re: [Lynx-dev] ..on SOCKS5 support

[Steffen Nurpmeso]

Mouse wrote in <address@hidden>:
 |> I have never encountered a system where short is longer than 16-bit,
 |> therefore i have used short.  Well, i seem to recall i might have
 |> heard of a system where short=int=32-bit, but this could be false
 |> memory or whatever.
 |
 |I've similarly seen it said; specifically, I've read that some DSPs
 |have compilers where char, short, int, and long are all the same size,
 |32 bits, because that's the smallest unit the hardware works with.

Ah, ok.

 |I've never actually used such a compiler myself.  But then, I've never
 |used anything Cish on a DSP, so that means little.

I would be in favour of Thorsten's adjustment then nonetheless.
Better than having a silent point of failure somewhere.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)