Re: [libredwg] Someone would like to join "again"

[Till Heuschmann]

Please not another branch, it will be hard enough to sync the existing 
branches. I do not think that there is such a big bug in r2004 decoding (the 
existing segfault can be fixed with the correct struct alignment!).

Why force a release? Are there any benefits?
To get closer to a release this should be fixed:
- memory management
- object management (store the objects in a rb-tree or a hash map)

You are very welcome to join libredwg again! I think about joining you.

Am 02.08.2013 um 18:51 schrieb Avneet Kaur <address@hidden>:

> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Felipe Castro <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>> My suggestion is a new branch getting rid of the R2004 stuff for now, and
>> release the working stuff "early".
> 
> If you think it's better to make a separate branch for R2004, then I will do.
> 
>> Do you think I could merge your code and do it now, while you finish your 
>> refactoring, or is it good to wait for more
>> of your work?
> 
> It's upto you. I have no objection, If you use my work to release
> future versions of library.
> Infact, I would be very glad to see my work done in coming versions.
> But still I request you to check/test in case of any bug, so that
> newer version of our library could be as much usable as
> possible.
> 
>> I'll go throught it, and then I make pertinent (or not, tell me)
>> suggestions, if any, ok?
> 
> Yeah, sure.
> 
> -- 
> Er. Avneet Kaur
> Blog: www.avneetkhasla.wordpress.com
> 
> "Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working
> together is success."
>