May I humbly suggest concentrating on read quality? There are a number of CAD packages out there that would be able to make good use of read ability but would be fine continuing to export to their own format for now. This would build a relationship with the cad software people early on.
On Aug 1, 2013 10:42 PM, "Avneet Kaur" <
address@hidden> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Felipe Castro <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello,
Welcome back.
> It's nice to see that people keep working on this stuff. I'm having a bit of
> time to dive into libredwg in these next few months, and I'd like to offer
> some help in order to reach a first release
We feel lucky that we got a chance to work with you.
> Isn't it to get a working and useful reading library for the early versions (R13, R14, R2000, R2004)? If
> it is working, why not to release just like that, an alpha version?
Library supporting these versions. But on parsing R2004 DWG file, it
throws segFault.
I think you should go through out once from previous mails to get an Idea.
> Next step, try to work out the writing capability?
Yes, agreed with you.
We have to concentrate on it's encoding functionality too.
> Next one, work on further versions (R2007, and so on)?
It is already in our GSoC milestones [0].
> I'm trying to understand the changes in the "refactoring" branch. I think
> it's mainly a matter of splitting the code in some smaller files. More
> include files to worry about, maybe it's worthwhile, if it brings more
> organization.
You can suggest any improvements.
>The doxygen stuff is cool also.
Thank you.
> And the r2007 stuff, I didn't touch it, too much for my brain now...
We will do now. :)
[0]: http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/avneet/16001
--
Er. Avneet Kaur
Blog: www.avneetkhasla.wordpress.com
"Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working
together is success."