[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-glpk] testing glpk 4.46 on 64-bit platform
From: |
Andrew Makhorin |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-glpk] testing glpk 4.46 on 64-bit platform |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:39:51 +0400 |
Hi Robbie,
> My 64-bit system:
>
> Ubuntu 10.04 Linux 2.6.32-31-generic
> 2.40GHz Intel Core i5-520M / 4096MiB RAM
> gcc version 4.4.3
>
> I just tested GLPK 4.46 as you requested using the file
> WOOD1P.SIF from the NETLIB suite.
>
> http://www.numerical.rl.ac.uk/cute/netlib.html
> ftp://ftp.numerical.rl.ac.uk/pub/cuter/netlib.tar.gz
>
> $ ll wood1p.sif
> -r--r----- 1 robbie users 2288302 Apr 28 19:24 wood1p.sif
>
> Everything is basically good.
Thank you very much. (As Russians say: I owe you a bag of beet :)
> But I have the following
> observations.
>
> 1/ During configuration, I guess this statement is what
> was sought:
>
> checking whether to use zlib data compression library... no
I will remove this configure check. It is no longer needed.
>
> 2/ The 'wood1p.sif' file needed the blank lines removed
> before GLPSOL would process the file. That could be a
> bit fussy -- at the very least, a message stating that
> blank lines are causing problems would be helpful.
Don't blank lines violate the mps format requirements?
>
> 3/ Your test 2 gave a small difference on output --
> leading and trailing zeros were added or the decimal
> points were omitted as required (I much prefer the GLPK
> formatting), for example (GLPK second):
>
> RHS TOTALL 1. BMIN01 .85
> RHS1 TOTALL 1 BMIN01 0.85
It is impossible to keep the source formatting, because all numeric data
are stored in glp_prob as floating-point numbers. I think this must not
cause serious problems.
>
> 4/ Finally, and of more concern, GLPSOL ate my file
> when I incorrectly issued these commands:
>
> $ ls
> oops.sif.gz
> $ ./glpsol --check oops.sif --wmps oops.sif.gz
> $ ls
> <nothing!>
>
> GLPSOL should really not do that!
Glpsol removes all output files specified in the command line before it
starts processing.
Best regards,
Andrew Makhorin
Message not available
Re: [Help-glpk] testing glpk 4.46 on 64-bit platform, Joey Rios, 2011/04/28
Re: [Help-glpk] testing glpk 4.46 on 64-bit platform, Joey Rios, 2011/04/28
Re: [Help-glpk] testing glpk 4.46 on 64-bit platform, Robbie Morrison, 2011/04/28
Re: [Help-glpk] testing glpk 4.46 on 64-bit platform, Andrew Makhorin, 2011/04/28