Re: [Chicken-janitors] #1484: Should csc-options be valid at the top level too?

[Chicken Trac]

#1484: Should csc-options be valid at the top level too?
------------------------------------------+-------------------------
            Reporter:  mario              |      Owner:
                Type:  enhancement        |     Status:  new
            Priority:  not urgent at all  |  Milestone:  5.0
           Component:  build system       |    Version:  5.0
          Resolution:                     |   Keywords:  csc-options
Estimated difficulty:                     |
------------------------------------------+-------------------------

Comment (by evhan):

 I think common options for all components should go in a {{{(component-
 options ...)}}} item (or something similarly named), rather than at the
 top level of the egg file. We should probably still limit it to {{{csc-
 options}}} and {{{link-options}}}, though.

--
Ticket URL: <https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1484#comment:2>
CHICKEN Scheme <https://www.call-cc.org/>
CHICKEN Scheme is a compiler for the Scheme programming language.