[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-janitors] #1484: Should csc-options be valid at the top level t
From: |
Chicken Trac |
Subject: |
[Chicken-janitors] #1484: Should csc-options be valid at the top level too? |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jul 2018 18:43:26 -0000 |
#1484: Should csc-options be valid at the top level too?
-------------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: mario | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: not urgent at all | Milestone: 5.0
Component: build system | Version: 5.0
Keywords: csc-options | Estimated difficulty:
-------------------------------+----------------------------
Currently, {{{csc-options}}} is not valid at the top level of .egg files.
That leads to a lot of code duplication in case eggs declare multiple
components.
How about allowing a top level {{{csc-options}}} declaration that can be
clobbered by component-specific {{{csc-options}}} declarations?
--
Ticket URL: <https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1484>
CHICKEN Scheme <https://www.call-cc.org/>
CHICKEN Scheme is a compiler for the Scheme programming language.
- [Chicken-janitors] #1484: Should csc-options be valid at the top level too?,
Chicken Trac <=