[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: basename function in 4.3 cygwin
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: basename function in 4.3 cygwin |
Date: |
Fri, 21 May 2021 18:57:45 +0300 |
> From: Ronald Hoogenboom <RHoogenboom@irdeto.com>
> CC: "psmith@gnu.org" <psmith@gnu.org>, "bug-make@gnu.org" <bug-make@gnu.org>
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 15:17:53 +0000
>
> As I said, possibly not a bug, but a change in functionality nevertheless.
> It is all about what you consider to be "the directory part" and this
> consideration has apparently changed.
Not in the native port of Make, it didn't (I just tried). Maybe in
the Cygwin port, which I don't have.
> The root cause of this is (as always) the dual meaning of a backslash: an
> escape character or a path separator. Maybe a better way of escaping would be
> single-quoting it. Note that in my real use-case, the character after the
> backslash is a '?', which needs to be passed un-molested by the shell. I have
> some weird experiences with single quoting in makefiles, though.
AFAIK, the Windows port treats the backslash as a quote character
where it makes sense (e.g., in wildcards).
- Re: basename function in 4.3 cygwin, (continued)
Re: basename function in 4.3 cygwin, Paul Smith, 2021/05/21