[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: basename function in 4.3 cygwin
From: |
Ronald Hoogenboom |
Subject: |
RE: basename function in 4.3 cygwin |
Date: |
Fri, 21 May 2021 14:49:06 +0000 |
Maybe it is not a bug, as I already indicated in my OP. The fact that it
behaves different than 3.81 used to is "the regression". Maybe the change just
fixes a bug in 3.81 and the behavior of 4.x is how it should have worked all
along, it's just a matter on how you look at it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Sent: Friday, 21 May 2021 4:18 PM
To: Ronald Hoogenboom <RHoogenboom@irdeto.com>
Cc: psmith@gnu.org; bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: basename function in 4.3 cygwin
> From: Ronald Hoogenboom <RHoogenboom@irdeto.com>
> CC: "bug-make@gnu.org" <bug-make@gnu.org>
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 13:57:49 +0000
> Accept-Language: en-US
>
> I checked the native windows port of gnu-make I have (x86_64-pc-msys, version
> 4.2.1) and it exhibits the same behavior as what I see on cygwin. Apparently
> this is not cygwin specific.
>
> Since you state that there were some changes done between 3.81 and 4.x with
> regards to the backslash path separator, I guess that is what caused this
> regression.
What is the regression? can you show an example that can be reproduced and
analyzed?
The native Windows port of GNU Make interprets backslashes as directory
separators, as expected. If this is what you see, it isn't a bug.
Re: basename function in 4.3 cygwin, Paul Smith, 2021/05/21