[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question about anchor database
From: |
Shigio Yamaguchi |
Subject: |
Re: question about anchor database |
Date: |
Tue, 20 May 2003 10:27:35 +0900 |
> I timed the execution time of htags using each of three formats of tags files
.
> Source code is linux-2.4.20. -D and -c of htags were used.
Yes, GLOBAL use three database format:
(a) standard format
% gtags
(b) pathindex format
% gtags -cc
It is undocumented but is the middle between (a) and (c).
(c) compact format
% gtags -c
> As for any format, creation of an anchor database has taken time most.
> Is this a result as expected?
> Even if it takes time like this, is there any meaning which makes an anchor d
atabase?
Htags(1) creates anchor database for performance reason.
(at the message: (#) making temporary database ...)
But htags(1) is independent of database format of tag files.
Gtags(1) creates tag files and global(1) read from them. Htags(1) uses gtags(1)
and global(1) but doesn't know the database format.
Why do you think anchor database is tied up with database format of tag files?
--
Shigio Yamaguchi <address@hidden> - Tama Communications Corporation
Spare mail address: <address@hidden>
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3