Re: Why does tramp-error invoke message in addition to signaling the error?

[Michael Albinus]

Julian Scheid <address@hidden> writes:

> Would it be worth making the call to tramp-message here configurable,
> and maybe disabled by default? If tramp code is called from within
> ignore-errors, condition-case or the like then displaying the error
> seems unnecessary verbiage; and outside of these constructs the error
> would be reported anyway.

I've committed a respective patch.

Best regards, Michael.