[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tramp (2.0.36); tramp-rsh-end-of-line needs to be changed in my conf
From: |
Greek0 |
Subject: |
Re: tramp (2.0.36); tramp-rsh-end-of-line needs to be changed in my configuration. |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Jun 2004 17:14:10 +0200 |
On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 16:53:47 +0200
Kai Grossjohann <address@hidden> wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
> > At first it really didn't look that tramp-rsh-end-of-line was the
> > source of the problem. I tried playing with the
> > tramp-shell-prompt-pattern, because I thought that's why the prompt
> > isn't recognized. Then I thought
> > tramp-open-connection-setup-interactive-shell inserted an
> > adiditional \n somewhere, from there I dug into
> > tramp-send-command-internal, where I finally found
> > tramp-rsh-end-of-line.
> >
> > Long story short: It's not obvious to change tramp-rsh-end-of-line,
> > so a remark somewhere (aside from the documentation of a variable I
> > didn't even bother to look at in the beginning) would be nice.
>
> Yes. Can you say where you started looking? Perhaps it was
> tramp-shell-prompt-pattern? If this is the case, then maybe I should
> say that it would be good to look in the *tramp/foo* buffer (or is it
> the *debug tramp/foo* buffer that you need to look at?) for doubled
> prompts. For that case, people are advised to look at
> tramp-rsh-end-of-line.
I think the error message is already a quite strong indicator:
stty -inlcr -echo kill '^U' failed (or something like this).
In the debug buffer you can see the double prompt "$ $ " and the
tramp-shell-prompt-pattern regex, but I really think the stty failure
message is unique enough.
Cheers,
Greek0
Re: tramp (2.0.36); tramp-rsh-end-of-line needs to be changed in my configuration., Kai Grossjohann, 2004/06/06