RE: tramp 2.0.14: Why does de/encoding fail?

[Tim Hermans]

> address@hidden (Kai Großjohann) writes:
>
> > No, you're lying :-)
>
> Whee.  Please don't be offended.  Of course, you didn't
> _intentionally_ say something which is false!  Just a mistake.
>
> Often people have said that they know exactly what is the right
> setting for Tramp and they are miffed that Tramp insists on checking
> itself.  You were just a convenient example of a person who was so
> sure to be right, yet wrong.  Maybe I shouldn't make jokes at other
> people's expenses :-|
>

Don't worry, I didn't take offense.  I was being pedantic just to make a
point.  I appreciate that Tramp insists on checking for itself.  I was just
saying it shouldn't fail because of all that checking.

tlh