tlf-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tlf-devel] tlf without hamlib?


From: Thomas Beierlein
Subject: Re: [Tlf-devel] tlf without hamlib?
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 06:55:17 +0100

Hi Zoli, hi Ervin,

Am Wed, 24 Jan 2018 21:34:29 +0100
schrieb Ervin Hegedüs <address@hidden>:

> Hi Zoli,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:19:45PM +0100, Csahok Zoltan wrote:
> > Hi Ervin, hi Tom,
> > 
> > Thanks for your replies. So, if there are no further objections
> > then I put making hamlib mandatory on the top of my list.
> > 
Please go ahead. I would suggest to do it in a separate branch, e.g.
'pre1.4' as we should do a step on the minor version number for
that change.


73, de Tom DL1JBE

> > In fact it seems that even xmlrpc is compiled in the packaged
> > versions. But that I would not touch now.  
> 
> the xmlrpc related code was my work - it necessary for the Fldigi
> interface (that's the Fldigi's "official" interface to
> communicate with external applications).
> 
> I guess the most Tlf user compiles the binary from source,
> instead of use the packaged version of current distro.
> 
> The Hamlib is - as you wrote - the de-facto RIG interface on
> Linux, so it should be a strict part of Tlf, I think not so much
> user wants to ignore it.
> 
> But also I guess, the most user doesn't want to use the xmlrpc,
> so I'ld keep it as it now exists - just for your info.
> 
> 
> 73, Ervin
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tlf-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel



-- 
"Do what is needful!"
Ursula LeGuin: Earthsea
--




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]