Re: Decomissioning vaporware/obsolete/inactive GNU projects

[Ineiev]

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 11:39:13AM +0200, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> 
> > Your proposal sounds good to me.  After looking at our
> > method of decommissioning, do you propose any changes in it?
> 
> The method looks good to me.
> Except this point:
> 
> - savannah: status=orphaned; note in summary.
> 
> That only makes sense for packages that 1) have functional source code
> and 2) have been decomissioned due to lack of maintenance.  IMO we
> should not be looking for maintainers otherwise. ("orphaned" implies are
> looking for someone to take care of them.)

We could add a Savannah status like 'decommissioned' or what would fit
it better.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature