Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PULL 03/11] sm501: Add some more unimplemented registers

[Peter Maydell]

On 11 January 2018 at 04:59, David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: BALATON Zoltan <address@hidden>
>
> These are not really implemented (just return zero or default values)
> but add these so guests accessing them can run.
>
> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/display/sm501.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/display/sm501.c b/hw/display/sm501.c
> index b9b611131e..4f7dc59b25 100644
> --- a/hw/display/sm501.c
> +++ b/hw/display/sm501.c
> @@ -795,6 +795,8 @@ static uint64_t sm501_system_config_read(void *opaque, 
> hwaddr addr,
>      case SM501_ARBTRTN_CONTROL:
>          ret = s->arbitration_control;
>          break;
> +    case SM501_COMMAND_LIST_STATUS:
> +        ret = 0x00180002; /* FIFOs are empty, everything idle */
>      case SM501_IRQ_MASK:
>          ret = s->irq_mask;
>          break;

Is this new case missing a "break;" statement? Coverity points
out that we fall through and overwrite the previous assignment
to 'ret' (CID 1385154).

thanks
-- PMM