qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v12 3/7] target/riscv: Add helper functions to calculate curr


From: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/7] target/riscv: Add helper functions to calculate current number of masked bits for pointer masking
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 18:07:59 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird



On 12/5/24 8:23 AM, baturo.alexey@gmail.com wrote:
From: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com>
---
  target/riscv/cpu.h        |  5 +++
  target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index 417ff45544..74d7076f5a 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -768,8 +768,13 @@ void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPURISCVState *env, vaddr *pc,
bool riscv_cpu_is_32bit(RISCVCPU *cpu); +bool riscv_cpu_virt_mem_enabled(CPURISCVState *env);
+RISCVPmPmm riscv_pm_get_pmm(CPURISCVState *env);
+int riscv_pm_get_pmlen(RISCVPmPmm pmm);
+
  RISCVException riscv_csrr(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
                            target_ulong *ret_value);
+
  RISCVException riscv_csrrw(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
                             target_ulong *ret_value,
                             target_ulong new_value, target_ulong write_mask);
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
index dba04851d5..2558f869f2 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
@@ -214,6 +214,80 @@ void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPURISCVState *env, vaddr *pc,
      *pflags = flags;
  }
+RISCVPmPmm riscv_pm_get_pmm(CPURISCVState *env)
+{
+    RISCVPmPmm pmm = PMM_FIELD_DISABLED;
+#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+    if (get_field(env->mstatus, MSTATUS_MPRV) &&
+        get_field(env->mstatus, MSTATUS_MXR)) {
+        return pmm;
+    }
+    int priv_mode = cpu_address_mode(env);
+    /* Get current PMM field */
+    switch (priv_mode) {
+    case PRV_M:
+        if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_smmpm) {
+            pmm = get_field(env->mseccfg, MSECCFG_PMM);
+        }
+        break;
+    case PRV_S:
+        if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_smnpm) {
+            if (get_field(env->mstatus, MSTATUS_MPV)) {
+                pmm = get_field(env->henvcfg, HENVCFG_PMM);
+            } else {
+                pmm = get_field(env->menvcfg, MENVCFG_PMM);
+            }
+        }
+        break;
+    case PRV_U:
+        if (riscv_has_ext(env, RVS)) {
+            if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_ssnpm) {
+                pmm = get_field(env->senvcfg, SENVCFG_PMM);
+            }
+        } else {
+            if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_smnpm) {
+                pmm = get_field(env->menvcfg, MENVCFG_PMM);
+            }
+        }
+        break;
+    default:
+        g_assert_not_reached();
+    }
+#endif
+    return pmm;
+}
+
+bool riscv_cpu_virt_mem_enabled(CPURISCVState *env)
+{
+    bool virt_mem_en = false;
+#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+    int satp_mode = 0;
+    int priv_mode = cpu_address_mode(env);
+    if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV32) {
+        satp_mode = get_field(env->satp, SATP32_MODE);
+    } else {
+        satp_mode = get_field(env->satp, SATP64_MODE);
+    }
+    virt_mem_en = ((satp_mode != VM_1_10_MBARE) && (priv_mode != PRV_M));
+#endif
+    return virt_mem_en;
+}
+
+int riscv_pm_get_pmlen(RISCVPmPmm pmm)
+{
+    switch (pmm) {
+    case PMM_FIELD_DISABLED:
+        return 0;
+    case PMM_FIELD_PMLEN7:
+        return 7;
+    case PMM_FIELD_PMLEN16:
+        return 16;
+    default:
+        g_assert_not_reached();
+    }
+    return -1;

You don't need a 'return -1' here since all possible return values are already
covered in the 'switch' and the default label is using g_assert_not_reached(),
i.e. you'll never return -1. The compiler will be fine with it - we use this
kind of pattern all the time (cpu_get_fcfien() does this in this same file).

You can remove the -1 return and even turn the helper to uint32_t. That way
the caller knows that there's no need to handle negative values.


Thanks,

Daniel


+}
+
  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
/*




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]