Re: [Protux-devel] [OT] protux in the press ...

[reinhard]

On Monday 24 January 2005 20:16, Luciano Domenico Giordana wrote:
> That shows that protux wasnt extensively tested, otherwise he would
> notice that only pan and gain are really implemented right now.

yes, I've rather got the same impression.

> Anyway, I liked the text . :-)  Except by the " proprietary"
> format... hehehe..
> regards

hehe, I knew that you would say this :-))
most people think about commercial software in that context.

greetings
reinhard


>
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:51:37 +0100, Reinhard Amersberger <address@hidden> 
wrote:
> > address@hidden (reinhard) schrieb am 24.01.05 08:30:15:
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > protux was mentioned in an article of a computer magazin called c't here
> > in germany. It is an extensive article describing audio-editors up to 200
> > EURO for windows, mac and also for linux. It is more a marginal note, but
> > it is at least a start. So watch my attempt of a hopefully correct
> > translation below ;-)
> >
> > btw - protux was mentioned beside apps like rezound, sweep, audacity.
> >
> > ARTICLE:
> >
> > "Protux's approach is very different, since the app has professional
> > ambitions. The software is controlled via keyboard and mouse movements
> > only (mouse clicks are necessary only in some dialogs). This is extremely
> > uncommonly at first sight - so being successful in doing the first basic
> > editing steps will take some time. The JMB emgine is an interesting
> > approach, but you need an initial training to work really fast in the
> > end. Anyhow, some user will miss an option to control the program via
> > common mouse usage. Seems to be a very dogmatic philosophy - so it is
> > maybe hard to achieve a wide user acceptance.
> >
> > Protux´s export ficilities are restricted to WAV and a proprietary
> > fromat, but can read mp3 and ogg vorbis. Anyway: The internal effects can
> > be applied in real-time. In spite of all intractability, protux is a
> > young piece of software that should be further on watched closely."
> >
> > that's it, but I'm not sure what he mean when calling about internal
> > effects, since most are not functional right now ...
> >
> > greetings
> > reinhard
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Protux-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/protux-devel