[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New behavior proposal --halt -% with job killing
From: |
Ole Tange |
Subject: |
Re: New behavior proposal --halt -% with job killing |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Apr 2015 13:04:10 +0200 |
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Rasmus Villemoes <rv@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25 2015, Ole Tange <ole@tange.dk> wrote:
>
>> How about:
>>
>> --halt 2,25% == --halt 25%,2
:
> While at it, it would probably be nice to avoid the magic numbers
> (though they'd probably need to stick around for
> compatibility). Something like
>
> --halt on-fail,25%,no-cleanup (aka --halt 2,25%)
> --halt on-success,50%,cleanup (aka --halt -1,50%)
> --halt on-fail,cleanup (aka --halt 1)
> --halt never (aka --halt 0)
I agree with your observation on magic numbers, but I really do not
like these long names.
I would also like if we could re-use terminology from something
existing, so that there would be some familiarity with with the
concept already.
/Ole
- New behavior proposal --halt -% with job killing, Martin d'Anjou, 2015/04/21
- Re: New behavior proposal --halt -% with job killing, Ole Tange, 2015/04/22
- Re: New behavior proposal --halt -% with job killing, Ole Tange, 2015/04/25
- Re: New behavior proposal --halt -% with job killing, Rasmus Villemoes, 2015/04/25
- Re: New behavior proposal --halt -% with job killing,
Ole Tange <=
- Re: New behavior proposal --halt -% with job killing, Ole Tange, 2015/04/26
- Re: New behavior proposal --halt -% with job killing, Martin d'Anjou, 2015/04/27
- Re: New behavior proposal --halt -% with job killing, Ole Tange, 2015/04/27
- Re: New behavior proposal --halt -% with job killing, Ole Tange, 2015/04/27