[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --timeout 200%
From: |
Ole Tange |
Subject: |
Re: --timeout 200% |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 01:39:10 +0200 |
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Ole Tange <ole@tange.dk> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Ozgur Akgun <ozgurakgun@gmail.com> wrote:
:
> With the above '--timeout 5%' will normally kill 5% of the jobs - even
> if they are not "bad", and that might less useful than just a percent
> of the median run time:
>
> --timeout 200%
>
> which would kill all jobs taking more than twice as long as the median
> run time (using remedian to do median in finite memory).
>
> I do not think looking at the fastest jobs is a good indicator: You
> can have an odd job that is extremely fast while the median is much
> slower.
It is now implemented. Please give it a test.
/Ole
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: --timeout 200%,
Ole Tange <=