[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Running >10 jobs in parallel on the same remote machine
From: |
Ole Tange |
Subject: |
Re: Running >10 jobs in parallel on the same remote machine |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Aug 2012 12:41:25 +0200 |
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Thomas Sattler
<sattler@med.uni-frankfurt.de> wrote:
> Even so I'm still unhappy with the idea of "one separate
> ssh login per job". How about letting parallel doing the
> multiplexing on its own, running a shell or perl on the
> remote host to spawn the jobs?
I do not see how that would be possible. How would you implement
--transfer and --return?
I believe it may also make it harder to determine whether a job
failed, and thus make it harder to do --retries and --halt correctly.
/Ole
- Running >10 jobs in parallel on the same remote machine, Ole Tange, 2012/08/03
- Re: Running >10 jobs in parallel on the same remote machine, Thomas Sattler, 2012/08/03
- Re: Running >10 jobs in parallel on the same remote machine, Thomas Sattler, 2012/08/03
- Re: Running >10 jobs in parallel on the same remote machine, Ole Tange, 2012/08/04
- Re: Running >10 jobs in parallel on the same remote machine, Thomas Sattler, 2012/08/04
- Re: Running >10 jobs in parallel on the same remote machine,
Ole Tange <=
- Re: Running >10 jobs in parallel on the same remote machine, Ole Tange, 2012/08/05