[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Openexr-devel] OpenEXR v2.1.0 released
From: |
Piotr Stanczyk |
Subject: |
Re: [Openexr-devel] OpenEXR v2.1.0 released |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:35:34 +0000 |
Hmm- that is odd.
The missing files you refer to are indeed installed on a fresh run for me.
Would you let me know how you are building the code base?
On *nix systems the recommended path is still via autoconf. CMake is still
being worked on largely.
Thanks \
- Piotr
________________________________________
From: Rex Dieter address@hidden
Sent: 27 November 2013 09:27
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: OpenEXR v2.1.0 released
Piotr Stanczyk wrote:
> OpenEXR v2.1.0 has been released and is available for download. This
> release includes the following components (version locked):
>
> * OpenEXR: v2.1.0
> * IlmBase: v2.1.0
> * PyIlmBase: v2.1.0
> * OpenEXR_Viewers: v2.1.0
I'm seeing several header-related failures with this release so far,
including:
1. OpenEXR_Viewers-2.1.0 build fails, references to non-existent header:
In file included from ImageView.cpp:43:0:
ImageView.h:44:28: fatal error: namespaceAlias.h: No such file or directory
#include "namespaceAlias.h"
I see openexr itself includes several copies of a namespaceAlias.h header,
should it be installed as part of the public API or should OpenEXR_Viewers
include a copy of it too?
2. Applications that build against openexr, fail due to references another
missing header:
/usr/include/OpenEXR/ImfStandardAttributes.h:60:40: fatal error:
ImfDeepImageStateAttribute.h: No such file or directory
Should this header be installed (per 'make install'), or the reference to it
removed?
-- Rex