[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Openexr-devel] bug in exrmaketiled / lib?
From: |
Axel Waggershauser |
Subject: |
Re: [Openexr-devel] bug in exrmaketiled / lib? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 May 2004 21:55:32 +0200 |
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 21:40, Florian Kainz wrote:
> Axel Waggershauser wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have come across some weired problems with tiled images created by
> > exrmaketiled: sometimes the resulting image can not be opened with the
> > error "Unexpected tile x coordinate." and sometimes some tiles seem to
> > be written only partial, i.e. part of them is black. What makes it all
> > even weirder is that it is not reliably repeatable.
> >
> > It might well be that my machine about to break (although I have no
> > problems other than these).
> >
> > Has anyone ever experienced something like that?
> >
> > Could it be that this is caused by the fact that I call exrmaketiled
> > with the system() C function from inside another program?
> >
>
>
> I have not seen exrmaketiled behave this way.
>
> Do you have an input file that makes exrmaketiled fail consistently,
> or at least most of the time? If so, send me the file, and I'll
> try to reproduce the error.
No, I don't. It happened about 3 times out of 20 trials with different
files and when I repeated it with a file that failed first it always
worked. I'll try to get a better feeling in wich circumstances this
behavior occurs and try to reproduce it.
> Are the input files very large? Is exrmaketiled possibly running
> out of memory, or out of disk space? In this case, the program
> should abort with an error message, but I have been testing exrmaketiled
> on a machine with lots of RAM and file space, so I don't know for
> sure what happens.
The file size is 4096x4096 pixels of type half and I have 500M ram and
1G swap, I don't think its an out of memory problem.
> What operating system are you using?
I am using Debian testing, i.e. the used lib version is 1.1.1 since
there is no 1.2 package available, yet. But as I understand there is no
significant difference between 1.1.1 and 1.2, right?
I didn't really expect anyone to have come across this problem, but the
chance was worth the mail.
Thanks,
Axel.