Re: [Mifluz-dev] Problems with mifluz

[Søren Raunsbæk Jørgensen]

Hi

I found this in the manual of mufluz:

wordlist_wordkey_document [field ...] (default none) 

      A white space separated list of field numbers that define a
      document. The field number list must not contain gaps. For
      instance 1 2 3 is valid but 1 3 4 is not valid.  This
      configuration parameter is not used by the mifluz library but
      may be used by a query application to define the semantic of a
      document. In response to a query, the application will return a
      list of results in which only distinct documents will be shown.

I believe that the list "2 3 4" has a gap. It is missing 1 in front! If
someone knows something else please let me know!

-- 
Soeren


Yann Poupet <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi,
> 
> Fist of all, sorry for my poor english.
> 
> I'm working on mifluz and I've allmost succeeded in what I wanted to
> do, but I still have a problem;
> 
> My key is Word/relevance/appId/rowid/groupid
> 
> a unique document is when (appId/rowid/groupid) is unique. Relevance
> is just here to know what weight have the given word in the doc, and
> is at the first position in order to have most relevant docs
> first. I have no field giving the position of the word in the
> document.
> 
> here is my conf file:
> 
> wordlist_extend: true
> minimum_word_length: 1
> maximum_word_length: 25
> wordlist_cache_size: 10485760
> wordlist_page_size: 32768
> wordlist_compress: 0
> wordlist_wordrecord_description: NONE
> wordlist_wordkey_description: Word 32/Rel 16/AppId 16/Rowid 24/GroupId 24
> wordlist_compress_debug: 0
> wordlist_monitor: false
> wordlist_wordkey_document: 2 3 4
> wordlist_wordkey_location: NONE
> 
> When I search for multi words, I have matches only when the words
> have the same relevance and when wordlist_wordkey_document is 1 2 3
> 4.
> 
> Because a unique doc is described by appId/rowid/groupid, I thought
> wordlist_wordkey_document should be 2 3 4. Am I right/wrong?
> 
> But when I define wordlist_wordkey_document as 2 3 4, it doesn't
> work.
> 
> Another problem when I search for multi words (it doesn't happen for
> a single word search), is the reuse of the cache. For the first
> search, that works (if there are results, of course). The second
> time, it works again (reusing the cache). And from the third time,
> it won't work anymore unless I remove cache files.
> 
> 
> Any ideas??
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mifluz-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mifluz-dev