[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: upstream license doc change
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: upstream license doc change |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:51:13 -0400 |
Hi Eric,
On Jul 15, 2007, at 12:11 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Also, an editing question - currently we have Appendix A as the GPL
and
Appendix B as the FDL; would it look better to just have one
Appendix A
for licenses, with A.1 being GPL and A.2 being FDL?
My reasoning was to have one appendix for the software license and
another
for the license of the manual itself. I don't have any strong objection
if you'd like to change it as you suggest though :-)
Cheers,
Gary
--
())_. Email me: address@hidden
( '/ Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net
/ )= ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
`(_~)_ Join my AGLOCO Network: http://www.agloco.com/r/BBBS7912
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part