Re: [PATCH] Line synchronisation output in comments

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Hi Eric,

On 28 May 2007, at 22:47, Eric Blake wrote:

According to Eric Blake on 5/25/2007 11:26 AM:

Meanwhile, I have to port it to HEAD.  And I would also like to fix the bug 

that I uncovered in the interactions between -s and divert (but probably only 

on head, as I think it will be pretty invasive for a stable branch

Agreed.

).  For an 

example of the bug, note that "#line 3" is not a preprocessor directive any 

more.

Here's the port to head; I'm still playing with improving the quality of

head's syncline reporting, but wanted to get this synced up first (yes

Gary, I'm trying to do better at keeping the branches synchronized in a

timely manner :).

Duly noted (-;

And thanks for all your recent patches and testing!

Cheers,

Gary

-- 

  ())_.              Email me: address@hidden

  ( '/           Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net

  / )=         ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

`(_~)_ Join my AGLOCO Network: http://www.agloco.com/r/BBBS7912 

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part