[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branch-1_4 off-by-one in line reporting
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: branch-1_4 off-by-one in line reporting |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:56:01 -0500 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Eric,
On 12 Oct 2006, at 16:13, Eric Blake wrote:
I still want CVS head to follow Solaris' parsing precedence
rules (macros, then quotes, then comments), rather than the current
behavior
(comments, macros, quotes).
Can you remind me why that is? The first thing that happens in any
parser I'm familiar with is to discard the comments, why is it a good
thing for M4 to behave differently? (I think I know an answer, but
I'm curious to understand your reasoning here)
Cheers,
Gary
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden
Research Scientist ( '/ http://blog.azazil.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/{libtool,m4}
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFFNTVZFRMICSmD1gYRAnS5AJ9tSCe1bAfTCOE+AHiwj2pAiRn6WgCgiVHK
RSJnWXfS4ZfjaIyfqrLUlg4=
=B+jV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- branch-1_4 off-by-one in line reporting, Eric Blake, 2006/10/11
- Re: branch-1_4 off-by-one in line reporting, Eric Blake, 2006/10/11
- Re: branch-1_4 off-by-one in line reporting, Eric Blake, 2006/10/12
- Re: branch-1_4 off-by-one in line reporting, Eric Blake, 2006/10/12
- head: Re: branch-1_4 off-by-one in line reporting, Eric Blake, 2006/10/13
- Re: branch-1_4 off-by-one in line reporting,
Gary V. Vaughan <=
- Re: branch-1_4 off-by-one in line reporting, Eric Blake, 2006/10/17
- Re: branch-1_4 off-by-one in line reporting, Gary V. Vaughan, 2006/10/18
- comment precedence [was: branch-1_4 off-by-one in line reporting], Eric Blake, 2006/10/28
Re: branch-1_4 off-by-one in line reporting, Eric Blake, 2006/10/25