[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8)
From: |
Matt Ackeret |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8) |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Mar 1998 15:10:35 -0800 (PST) |
On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Wayne Buttles wrote:
>On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Philip Webb wrote:
>
>> so shouldn't the Lynx development co-operative, as an international effort
>> working by consensus, find a way for the SSL hooks to be freely available
>> from some site outside the USA, if possible?
>
>Who prosecutes cases of munitions export? Is there actually a human I can
>ask if distributing lynx w/ssl is ok?
I don't know the answer, but apparently it is possible.. it's been in
the news lately that *some* hi tech company has been able to get export rights
for some high security stuff.
Is that vague or what? Read the news/business sections of the paper for the
last week..
Re: LYNX-DEV SSL for Lynx 2.8, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/03/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV SSL for Lynx 2.8, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/09
- LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), Philip Webb, 1998/03/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), Wayne Buttles, 1998/03/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), Mark H. Wood, 1998/03/10
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1998/03/10
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8),
Matt Ackeret <=
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), David Woolley, 1998/03/11
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (hooks are munitions?), Al Gilman, 1998/03/10
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx & US Govt (was SSL for Lynx 2.8), David Woolley, 1998/03/11
Re: LYNX-DEV SSL for Lynx 2.8, Personal, 1998/03/09
Re: LYNX-DEV SSL for Lynx 2.8, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/11