[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:10:00 +0000 |
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 06:04 -0600, Taranowski, Thomas (SWCOE) wrote:
> I think we should remove the parameters if they're not needed, even if
> it breaks current ports. We've already sort of passed the
> break-the-port barrier with the lwip_socket_init, which requires user
> apps to change.
>
> Having unused arguments and return value feels too much like legacy code
> for my comfort. New folks looking to port the source will likely waste
> time trying to figure out what the heck the unused arguments are for.
> Furthermore, the confusion deepens when going to google to look for
> implementation hints, and finding older ports that actually use the
> values.
Don't forget that the majority of ports are going to be archived soon as
there are no maintainers for them.
Kieran
- [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Goldschmidt Simon, 2007/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Dmitry Potapov, 2007/03/03
- Re: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Kieran Mansley, 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Goldschmidt Simon, 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Kieran Mansley, 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Taranowski, Thomas \(SWCOE\), 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization,
Kieran Mansley <=
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Goldschmidt Simon, 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Kieran Mansley, 2007/03/05