[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ps2pdf issue with ps files
From: |
Barrie Stott |
Subject: |
Re: ps2pdf issue with ps files |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jun 2014 07:09:37 +0100 |
Hi Philippe,
Some time ago I had a similar problem but I don't remember details. What
follows below is what was used to solve the problem for me. I have not tried
this recently but simply copied the email so use it with some caution.
Barrie.
===================
On 20 Jun 2011, at 10:07, Barrie Stott wrote:
>
> On 18 Jun 2011, at 19:29, Tristan Williams wrote:
>
>> On 16Jun11 11:10, Barrie Stott wrote:
>>> Does anyone use lout successfully on OS X? In particular, do documents
>>> print properly?
>>>
>>> I use gv to display and to print my lout-produced documents. gv displays
>>> internally using ghostscript so fonts such as palatino and bookman, which
>>> lout knows about, display without problem. I have gv set to print using lp
>>> since ghostscript doesn't know about my printer, an old HP LaserJet 4L.
>>> This uses Apple fonts so palatino displays ok but bookman is not in my set
>>> of mac fonts, causing a different font to be substituted; it makes text
>>> readable but not worth using permanently.
>>>
>>> If anyone knows how to solve my problem, I would be very pleased to hear
>>> how!
>>>
>>> Barrie.
>>
>> This is really very, very similar to Wolfram's suggestion, with
>> -dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress being key, but I did not want to have the
>> chain of scripts that ps2pdf calls as some of the (non OS X) machines
>> I work on didn't have them.
>>
>> I use lout on OS X extensively. I get lout to produce Postscript
>> output and ghostscript to convert that Postscript to pdf. A command
>> line something like this might work for you.
>>
>> lout file.lout | gs -sDEVICE=pdfwrite \
>> -dBATCH \
>> -dSAFER \
>> -sPAPERSIZE=a4 \
>> -sOutputFile=file.pdf \
>> -dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress \
>> -c .setpdfwrite \
>> -
>>
>> where file.lout, file.pdf, a4 should be changed as appropriate and \
>> means a line continuation. The resultant pdf should be printable by
>> any printer supported by OS X. Wrap (carefully) the above command in a
>> shell script and you have print-to-pdf from lout.
>
> Many thanks for your reply and I apologize for the delay in replying; I've
> been busy with a funeral and a ruby wedding celebration.
>
> After an initial hiccup it simply worked! I've struggled with printing since
> the beginning of the year; pages that printed fine on linux would be offset
> slightly. On the one and only print I've tried, even that seems to be
> correct. To say that I'm overjoyed is an understatement. Now I have to
> convince myself that my single correct print is merely the start of all
> prints being correct.
>
> Wolfram's solution didn't work for me so I'll pass on your solution to him.
>
>> I would add, however, that the pleasure of having a printer that
>> understands Postscript directly should not be underestimated.
>
> I'll bear that in mind. I've never had one and suspect that my current
> printer will not be around for too long.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Barrie.