[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops
From: |
Greg Chicares |
Subject: |
Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jan 2017 03:32:38 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.6.0 |
On 2017-01-11 22:39, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
>
> https://github.com/vadz/lmi/pull/52
Do you see any reason why I should not apply the following patch in
addition? The array should be const, of course. And the for loop is
almost identical to the one in DurationModeChoice's ctor a few lines
above. SetStringSelection() is probably slower than SetSelection(),
but I doubt that makes a noticeable difference. Alternatively, we
could add a counter in the loop and call SetSelection(counter), but
I'm not sure that's worth the extra code.
---------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<-------
--- a00/52b/input_sequence_entry.cpp 2017-01-14 23:36:42.329382936 +0000
+++ ./input_sequence_entry.cpp 2017-01-14 23:47:08.030305282 +0000
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
char const* label;
};
-choice_value duration_mode_choice_values[] =
+static choice_value const duration_mode_choice_values[] =
{
{e_retirement, "until retirement"},
{e_attained_age, "until age"},
@@ -137,11 +137,11 @@
void DurationModeChoice::value(duration_mode x)
{
- for(unsigned int i = 0; i < duration_mode_choices; ++i)
+ for(auto const& i : duration_mode_choice_values)
{
- if(x == duration_mode_choice_values[i].mode)
+ if(x == i.mode)
{
- SetSelection(i);
+ SetStringSelection(i.label);
return;
}
}
--------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------
- Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, (continued)
- Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Greg Chicares, 2017/01/13
- Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Greg Chicares, 2017/01/13
- Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Vadim Zeitlin, 2017/01/13
- Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Vadim Zeitlin, 2017/01/13
- [lmi] Improving usability of automated tests [Was: [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops], Greg Chicares, 2017/01/13
- Re: [lmi] Improving usability of automated tests, Vadim Zeitlin, 2017/01/13
- Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Greg Chicares, 2017/01/13
- Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Greg Chicares, 2017/01/13
Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Greg Chicares, 2017/01/13
Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops,
Greg Chicares <=
- Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Vadim Zeitlin, 2017/01/15
- Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Greg Chicares, 2017/01/15
- Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Vadim Zeitlin, 2017/01/15
- Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Greg Chicares, 2017/01/16
- Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Vadim Zeitlin, 2017/01/16
- Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Greg Chicares, 2017/01/16
- Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Vadim Zeitlin, 2017/01/17
Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Greg Chicares, 2017/01/18
Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Greg Chicares, 2017/01/19
Re: [lmi] [PATCH] C++ m11n: range-based for loops, Vadim Zeitlin, 2017/01/20