[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re[4]: Frescobaldi?
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: |
Re: Re[4]: Frescobaldi? |
Date: |
Mon, 06 May 2024 16:37:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.52.1 (3.52.1-1.fc40) |
Le lundi 06 mai 2024 à 14:05 +0000, Steph Phillips a écrit :
> Well, I'm glad you asked about feedback because I'm curious what other
> folks who contribute to Frescobaldi might think.
>
> After digging around in the codebase, I'm wondering if the application
> might benefit from a more object-oriented design. It's definitely in
> Python, but with more of C-style approach. You've worked on it, you know
> what I'm talking about. Was wondering what your thoughts are.
I wouldn't focus on large-scale refactorings that will only pay off on the
long term without first (1) doing smaller things to get used to the code and
(2) doing what needs to get done on the short term to be able to do releases
and keep up to date with the rest of the world.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: Frescobaldi?, Graham King, 2024/05/05
- Re: Frescobaldi?, Jean Abou Samra, 2024/05/05
- Re[2]: Frescobaldi?, Steph Phillips, 2024/05/06
- RE: Re[2]: Frescobaldi?, carsonmark, 2024/05/06
- Re: Re[2]: Frescobaldi?, Jean Abou Samra, 2024/05/06
- Re[4]: Frescobaldi?, Steph Phillips, 2024/05/06
- Re: Re[4]: Frescobaldi?, Knute Snortum, 2024/05/06
- Re: Re[4]: Frescobaldi?, Jean Abou Samra, 2024/05/06
- Re[6]: Frescobaldi?, Steph Phillips, 2024/05/06
- Re: Re[4]: Frescobaldi?,
Jean Abou Samra <=
- Re: Re[4]: Frescobaldi?, Tom Brennan, 2024/05/06
Re: Frescobaldi?, Valentin Petzel, 2024/05/06