[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [large/complex projects] where should transpositions go?
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: [large/complex projects] where should transpositions go? |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jan 2024 06:28:24 -0500 |
Hi Timothy,
> If I have understood Kieren correctly, he wants the option to configure his
> score with a part either sung by a tenor voice at written pitch, or a treble
> voice one octave higher.
Correct.
> The attached files illustrate a couple of suggestions that might help.
> • Set up new contexts (TrebleStaff, TenorStaff) that automatically
> insert the right clef, and transpose the notes up an octave in the
> TrebleStaff.
> • Use a tag group that is adjusted to build the various styles of
> score, while keeping the definition of the scores fixed.
This is a very interesting approach, which I will consider seriously for many
of the applications I have. In particular, it is superior to my current
“manually insert \transpose commands all over the place“ method. (And, p.s., I
love the small but important abstractions you also implemented, like \KMTags —
every reduction in duplication helps in such a complex/complicated structure!)
The one constraint/situation this might not handle is when the
transposition/octavation happens *mid-system*. I could, of course, just accept
that I always have to end a system and French the staves appropriately… but at
this stage of investigation, I want to know all of my options, and the
pros/cons of each approach.
Many thanks for this solution!
Kieren.
______________________________________________
My work day may look different than your work day. Please do not feel obligated
to read or respond to this email outside of your normal working hours.