[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
mention canceled releases on website? (was: status of release 2.16.0)
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
mention canceled releases on website? (was: status of release 2.16.0) |
Date: |
Sun, 20 May 2012 08:53:05 +0200 |
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Neil Thornock <address@hidden> wrote:
> According to this list:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list
>
> it looks like critical issues were found.
Yes, they were.
> Not sure why nothing was mentioned on the website.
I'm not happy with this practice, either.
On the other hand, when 2.14 was being released a year ago, the news
on website were all "release candidate", "release canceled", "release
candidate", "release canceled", "release candidate", "release
canceled" - it looked weird.
I suggest the following: when a critical bug is found, /modify/ second
paragraph of the "release candidate" news to this: <crossed out>There
are no known Critical issues with this release.</crossed out> A
Critical bug was found, this release candidate is canceled. (date)
Graham, what do you think?
cheers,
Janek
- mention canceled releases on website? (was: status of release 2.16.0),
Janek Warchoł <=