[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: page break failure
From: |
Hugh Myers |
Subject: |
Re: page break failure |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 00:18:25 -0700 |
Second point taken. I hope you realize that 2.13 has bug fixes for
2.12--- yes? Without those, there is no project... I don't suppose you
took a look? Did you notice that in included tablature? If you had,
then you would perhaps have sent me a different 'Most spacing bugs can
be reproduced...' Also note that I made no claim of 'BUG'. I am new at
this and would more likely expect the problem to have been caused by
something I did, not a bug.
--hsm
p.s. I am sufficiently new that I've no idea (although I can guess and
goggle) what you snippet does.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 09:57:00PM -0700, Hugh Myers wrote:
>> Pardon the length of the piece of code, but clearly demonstrates the
>> problem where as other pieces don't (got to be a page long for
>> instance...):
>
>> \version "2.13.7"
>
> I hope that you realize that 2.13.7 is an UNSTABLE, DEVELOPMENT
> release. If you would like to participate in de-bugging, your
> help would be appreciated, but please supply small,
> easy-to-understand examples.
>
> Most spacing bugs can be reproduced with something like
> \relative c' {
> \repeat unfold 128 { c4 c c c }
> }
>
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
- page break failure, Hugh Myers, 2009/12/01
- Re: page break failure, Graham Percival, 2009/12/02
- Re: page break failure,
Hugh Myers <=
- Re: page break failure, Marc Hohl, 2009/12/02
- Re: page break failure, Hugh Myers, 2009/12/02
- Re: page break failure, Marc Hohl, 2009/12/02
- Re: page break failure, Hugh Myers, 2009/12/02
- Re: page break failure, Alexander Kobel, 2009/12/02
- Re: page break failure, Hugh Myers, 2009/12/02
- Re: page break failure, Alexander Kobel, 2009/12/02